Criticism by Szydło
On Monday, after voting in the Sejm on candidates for the post of Deputy Marshal, Beata Szydło, the Euro MP of the Law and Justice, tweeted. She commented that the majority of the parliament rejected the candidacy of Elżbieta Witek from the Law and Justice, the marshal of the erstwhile term. She expressed the opinion that the more Holownia and Tusk talk about democracy, the more it is vulnerable.
Beata Szydło stated that erstwhile Marshal Holovnia took the position, he spoke a lot about the “democratisation” of the Sejm and the request for a fresh policy, while promoting his podcast. However, according to her, these are empty words due to the fact that the largest parliamentary club, or PiS, was denied the right to freely elect a candidate as Deputy Marshal of the Sejm.
At the end of the entry, Szydło stated that the more Holovnia and another Tusk allies talk about democracy, the more we should fear for its future.
No 1 expected Polish annotation
Putting your thoughts on the Twitter platform, Beata She did not anticipate her message to be annotated. It is possible for users to place it if they consider that the message is missing the facts.
The correction of the words of Szydło was as follows:
The PiS Club was not refused to appoint a candidate as Deputy talker of the Sejm. The PiS Club appointed Elizabeth Witek. Her candidacy was rejected by vote.
Marshal Holovnia, taking up his position, in addition to praising his podcast, spoke much about the “democratisation” of the Sejm and the request for a “new policy”. As these beautiful and high-pitched words are for practice, we saw shortly after the PiS – the largest parliamentary club -...
— Beata Szydło (@BeataSzdlo) November 13, 2023
Information about the fact that the words of Szydło were challenged rapidly attracted the attention of the media. possibly that's why Szydło decided to issue a message on the same portal where she accused this time of “politicised group of editors” of attacking her entries. erstwhile it seemed that the case was over, another note appeared under the message of Szydło.
Community notes are created by a diverse group of X users, and their display requires compatibility between users who sometimes disagreed with each another in their erstwhile assessments. This avoids unilateral assessments or contexts – A PiS politician was responded.
At the moment, we did not get another answer from Szydło.
Other PiS politicians besides improved
Beata Szydło is not the only case of adding annotation to a published statement. For example, Antoni Macierewicz found out. She tweeted that a group of politicians related to Tuski, who stressed women's rights during the election campaign, voted against Elizabeth Witek's candidacy for the position of Deputy Marshal of the Sejm. According to him, this was to show that women's rights were simply a tool of propaganda for the opposition, not a real postulate.
The case has no connection with women's rights, Elizabeth Witek was not supported by acts contrary to the law at the time she was the marshal of the erstwhile word – the community replied.
Banda Tuska, who spoke so much about women's rights during the election campaign, voted against Elizabeth Witek's proposed candidacy as Deputy Marshal of the Sejm.
On the first day of the meeting, they showed that women's rights were only a subject of propaganda, not a real postulate.
— Antoni Macierewicz (@Macierewicz_A) November 14, 2023
There was besides an endorsement in the authoritative account of Law and Justice.
Minister @mblaszczak: It is shameful that Marshal Simon Holovnia did not mention to the words of Mr Braun, who attacked the Marshal @elzbietawitek. It is bad news that the Marshal of the Sejm does not respond to specified scandalous statements. If he doesn't respond to that statement, then...
— Law and Justice (@pisorgpl) November 13, 2023
The full action seems to be guided by civic motives, and so far it's working great. The fact that presently the most specified annotations appear under the entries of members of the PiS organization does not show selectivity, but only the level of their comments. I think the sooner politicians like Szydło or Macerewicz realize this fact, the better for them.
