Everyone has a full mouth of democracy, but nobody wants to follow its rules due to the fact that it's uncomfortable for everyone. It is not convenient for politicians due to the fact that it makes it hard for them to rule; for power, due to the fact that it "produces" over-independent people; for the Church, due to the fact that it gives a voice to the faithful and allows multiple voices. But as it turns out, it is besides uncomfortable for citizens themselves, due to the fact that it sets a bar for them and sets standards, and most citizens (synerenes) want absolute freedom, independent of nothing – on the 1 hand they want chaos, and on the another hand they criticise it very much. So how is it that building democracies brings chaos. The substance is explained by discipline claiming that there is simply a hidden order in all chaos and waiting for it to occur.
Between the common and technological knowing of chaos, there are so many differences between time, explanation and origin that the average citizen can hit the trail. A citizen claims that chaos is bad and discipline is interesting; it is no different with democracy, which has so much explanation that it can besides be stupid. It turns out that democracy can be anarchy or tyranny or it can lead to tyranny. So statistical man must live in chaos and democracy, and he is incapable to specify or control them. As a scientist or politician, he can make a good profit, but as a citizen, he's gonna lose rather a lot.
So what is this “averaged” democracy? She grew up in the space between Aristotle, and let's say Modrzewski, Rousseau and John Paul II, who was a kid of Polish democracy. It was this space and this time that they modeled it, refined it, or brutalized it. Democracy requires, first of all, a good general and uniform education to defy political demolition and shrewdness; stableness not to accumulate excessive tensions; respect for man to advance humanism and humanity; acceptance of the state to form a community; self-culture to realize itself; sense of identity to know where he comes from and who he represents; reciprocated freedom to prevent the freedom of 1 from interfering with the freedom of another and a strong executive power that will safeguard the law which will not hold up the citizen. Chaos, especially political ones, is simply a subject to man's mastery, reason, experience and goodwill. He needs not so much explanation as men of state and wisdom of the nation.
In Poland, over the centuries, democracy has become part of our culture, and ourselves. But for over 300 years, but for the interwar period, it has been devastated by abroad “democracy”, totalitarian systems, or imposing or accepting their rights. The worst harm was done by her Bolshevikism. present parliamentary democracy, based on the state constitution, is slow crushed by the abroad appropriation of its sovereign elements. And this happens not with the consent of citizens, but with the silent approval of parliamentarians – representatives of a democratic nation. Today, a citizen, yes, must be equipped with the cognition of whom to "add" and who to delete, but above all he must have a clear formation that rationally justifies the choice, let him to measure the situation and make a favourable decision for a country without which he will not defend his own property or his family. So the most crucial thing is consciousness.
