The territory Attorney's Office in Gdańsk on 11 August 2026 dismissed the investigation of the apartments of the Museum of planet War II, due to the fact that the act does not contain the signs of a prohibited act. The order is not valid. For Karol Nawrocki, it is an crucial cross-section of the case, which political opponents tried to turn into a dense charge.
Prosecutor’s Office: the act does not contain any sign of a prohibited act
The Gdańsk territory Attorney's Office informed on 12 August that the day before, it had dropped the investigation into allowing free usage of rooms and apartments belonging to the Museum of planet War II in Gdańsk. It was a suspicion that the powers of a public officer were being exceeded, that is to say, the action under Article 231 of the Criminal Code.
The most crucial conclusion is clear: the reason for the write-off was the uncovering that the act does not contain any prohibited effect. The order is not valid and the parties are entitled to a complaint before the court. It's a procedural standard, but the political burden of this decision is obvious.
The case afraid the period erstwhile Karol Nawrocki headed the Museum of planet War II in Gdańsk. As of 6 April 2017, he served as Director, was appointed manager on 19 October 2017, and was recalled on 23 July 2021.
Where did the investigation come from?
The investigation was initiated on 24 February 2025 after the follow-up to the publication of the Election Gazette. A announcement from associate Roman Giertych was besides attached to the file. According to Nawrocka's 2018-2021 notice, as manager of the museum, he was to usage the area and flat offered commercially as a hotel service free of charge.
It was a convenient subject for opponents of the right: a memorial institution, Nawrocki's name, a proposition of private benefit. The political mechanics is well known. First the media thesis, then the pressure, then the anticipation that the investigation itself will be treated as a sentence.
The serious state is acting differently. The prosecution must pass through evidence, regulations and the work of circumstantial individuals. In this case, the D.A. collected broad material, not symbolic material.
41 witnesses and paper analysis
Investigators interviewed 41 witnesses, including 37 people working formerly and now at the planet War II Museum. Prints of area and flat reservations, email correspondence regarding the reservation, a calendar kept by the Director's Office, papers concerning duties, leave and sick leave were secured. A copy of the control files of the ultimate Audit Office was besides obtained and NIK staff were interviewed.
According to the prosecutor's notice, the analysis of the booking list showed 205 days with the endorsement “Director” or “Mr Director”. However, at 186 days there was a remark “the client did not arrive”. These are numbers that break down a simple media narrative. Reservation in the strategy is not yet proof of residence or proof of gain.
The prosecution besides established that from 4 to 13 November 2020 Karol Nawrocki was quarantined in 1 of the museum's apartments, where he performed his business activities. This is an crucial context, due to the fact that the case besides afraid the boundary between business and private use.
Powers of the manager and deficiency of access to the system
The communication shows that the rules governing the usage of rooms and apartments regulated the order of the museum director: No 50/2017 of 18 October 2017 and No 16/2020 of 25 May 2020. The second order gave the manager the right to grant relief and exemptions from the fees for utilizing apartments.
The prosecution stressed that it was not established beyond uncertainty that Karol Nawrocki actually resided in the flat assigned to him in the sense of renting it. Nor has it been established that he is aware of entries made by reception staff with the endorsement “Mr Director”.
There is 1 more thing: the trial experimentation showed that Nawrocki did not registry in the KW Hotel Pro strategy due to the fact that he had no access to it. According to the arrangements, the reception staff reserved the apartments themselves, at the direction of the managing department of the museum hotel part.
Political Lesson on the Case
This does not mean that public institutions should not have clear rules on the usage of assets. They should. Museums, offices and state companies must be immune to ambiguities, due to the fact that all gap immediately becomes ammunition in political dispute. But what is different is the request for administrative order, and what is different is the request to build a charge without fulfilling the forbidden.
For a national-conservative camp, the issue is wider. Karol Nawrocki remains 1 of the main points of mention on the rightSo any case with his name is immediately politically played. All the more reason to stick to the facts. The fact is, the D.A. dropped the investigation, indicating that there were no signs of a criminal offence.
It is besides worth remembering that it is the Museum of planet War II, an institution of peculiar importance for Polish historical memory. A dispute over apartments in the museum should not obscure the fundamental question: whether state memorial institutions are to service the Polish state's right or to be constantly drawn into the current organization war.
What's next?
The bail order is not valid. The parties may lodge a complaint with the court. If that happens, the case will come back in a court of law. Today, however, the procedural decision is beneficial to Karol Nawrocki and closes the heaviest dimension of the plea.
Politically, this communicative shows more than 1 case. In Poland, the investigation is besides easy confused with guilt, media publication with evidence, and notification of policy with procedural truth. The state of law requires patience with facts. And it's the facts, not the screaming, that should settle specified matters.
Source: Regional Prosecutor's Office in Gdańsk, One, Interia.
![Poles have revealed who they criticize most frequently in conversations with their loved ones. The consequence may come as a surprise [POLL]]()
