And whether according to journalistic standards or not, it doesn't substance anymore. Channel Zero creates fresh ethical standards. After talking to the murderer Janusz Walus and the last interview of Robert Mazurek with the Confederacy Przemysław Wipler Channel Zero, I don't think I'm amazed at anything anymore, due to the fact that anything is possible. More boundaries have been crossed.
Mazurka and Wipler spoke for almost 2 hours. The most interesting passages afraid drinking alcohol (beer and wine) and talking about “dude”. erstwhile asked by Mazurek whether Wipler drinks beer, he replied that Mazurek knows perfectly well that he prefers wine, due to the fact that they frequently met at the premises on a joint drink. Mazurek denied: “I have never had alcohol with you in my life” – for which the MP mentioned the names of the premises. amazed Mazury pulled up his sleeves due to the fact that he got hot. It was inactive worse due to the fact that Wipler reminded Mazurek that he had interviewed him for “Rzeczpospolita”: “You called me after that interview and said that you could make me look like a full jerk, that I talked specified stupid things out of me, but you made me a man, so I owe him good wine, but that as a mediocre MP, that I should take any turbo boring fellow who would take the wine and dinner bill.” In the 50th minute of the Mazurek program he got a "private esemess" and remembered that they were together on this wine. Half a minute later, Mazurek offered Wipler, "We'll go for wines you don't know." Now they were on you, even though you utilized to call her Mr... It should be apparent to everyone, including Mazurek, that erstwhile you drink with the politician you invitation to the studio, you enter into a conflict of interest, you lose your distance and you commit.
This broadcast is simply a blizzard, a zero-journalism showing paleness, getting along and arranging a writer with a politician, and drinking alcohol together, which Mazurek tried to hide from viewers. Let me remind you that he did not hide with his contacts with politicians before, and on his own birthday he invited many leading politicians of various options. Why wouldn't he confess to Wipler now? Why didn't he remember to drink wine together? possibly due to the fact that in talks on Channel Zero, he became part of Krzysztof Stanowski's electoral campaign, creating his informal electoral staff. Channel Zero has been a trampoline in the election run since the political declaration of its boss – to put it bluntly – and this cannot be hidden. Is that why Mazurek would say or how he preferred to remind Wipler that this 1 called Sławomir Mentzen (the Confederate candidate in the presidential election) a moron due to the fact that “there are people who say they heard it.” And that is the level of political debate in the media? Don't ask who compromised himself due to the fact that journalism was compromised.
For me, after that conversation, Mazurek stopped being a journalist. It is – it is actual – a showman and a satirist. All right, but let's not call it journalism. due to the fact that it's a circus or magic, or at best a cabaret. There is no point in looking for values specified as objectivity, impartiality, integrity, due to the fact that these categories are not about. It's all about ratings, entertainment, clickability and coverage. And by the way, the accomplishment of political objectives, although the audience would like to believe that the media is simply a very crucial instrument for controlling the planet of politics, and journalists are looking at politicians not only erstwhile they toast.
