I cannot defy this image due to the fact that it accurately describes the state after the presidential election, in which almost precisely as many people voted, though 2 different candidates. Like 2 audiences sitting other each other...
Nawrocki's win, as the commentators write, deepened the division of Polish society. However, erstwhile you look at both audiences, erstwhile you stick to this metaphor, where is this expected chasm? On both sides of the curtain sit precisely the same Poles: fearing for the future, for fragile security, conflicting power, insecurity of health, income, prospects for their children, complaining about pensions and mediocre social care. Do you think that both looking at each another is about a political dispute? Do they truly care about a tiny group of professional bastards surviving off our taxes? Does anyone truly experience the organization figures of Błaszczak, the perfect hoards of Witczak, and others spin the incurable deserts of Kosiniak or Holowniak? Is there a organization convention for individual outside the act? No! No! It doesn't substance much to society! effort listening in on any of the conversations with others erstwhile the rally dust settles. The voters of Trzaskowski and Nawrocki share little, due to the fact that everyone expects 1 from power – see above! I leave out the idiots, the ones on the street and the ones on the Sejm, the noisy ones, so notable, but I uncertainty all the coalition supporters are fascinated by the Slavek Nitras, and I don't believe that all right-wing sympathizers are impressed by Darek Matecki. These utmost wings are usually cut off by sensible voters thanks to social instinct.
