Andrzej Adamczyk, a PiS MP and erstwhile Minister of Infrastructure, accused the government of Donald Tusk of slowing down investments in CPK, especially rail spokes No. 3 and 7. The speech was made on 20 August on Radio Maryja. For Poland, fast connections, regional improvement and infrastructure sovereignty are at stake, not propaganda government lift.
Adamczyk: Government talks about improvement and cuts connections
Andrzej Adamczyk in the “News of the Day” broadcast on Radio Maryja assessed that Donald Tusk's government is conducting a policy of neglecting and slowing down strategical investments. He pointed to the Central Communication Port and the railway "speakers", that is, the component of the task which was to connect the regions with the heart of the Polish transport system.
The erstwhile Minister of Infrastructure said that, on the 1 hand, the government is talking about accelerating improvement and, on the another hand, the preparations for building the No. 3 spoke are to be frozen. He besides pointed out the deficiency of clear information on the No. 7, crucial for the Małopolska and Świętokrzyskie provinces. That's specific. Not a dispute over slides, but whether the Polish State treats the communication suburbs as a full part of the community.
CPK as a State Test
The CPK from the beginning was a task larger than the airport itself. It was about the aviation, railway and economical hub, which was to strengthen Poland's position between the West and the East. Therefore, the dispute over this investment is in fact a dispute over the ambition of the state: whether Poland is to build its own strategical infrastructure, or whether it is to satisfy the function of a transit country, which is attached to another people's interests.
The government is promoting the Integrated Railway Network today. Ministry of Infrastructure served on 15 June 2026.that the plan covers 4,700 km of fresh lines, 19 buses and access to the railway network for 27 tiny and medium-sized cities. The numbers themselves sound good. The question, however, is which sections will have funding, timetable and political protection against further changes.
That's the point of Adamczyk's accusation. Investment propaganda is easy. Just a conference, a map and a promise of Poland in a 100 minutes. The state is well aware of the fact that it keeps the projects going even erstwhile power changes. In DN, we already wrote that Port Poland in 2032 requires a hard account for the countrybecause large infrastructure without a clear cost bill and deadlines becomes susceptible to political PR repackaging.
Regions must not be the victim of a map correction
Railway spokes were to respond to the real problem: Poland developed unevenly, and transport besides frequently strengthened respective major metropolises at the expense of weaker regions. For the inhabitants of Podlasie, Mazur, Małopolska or Świętokrzyskie the railway line is not an abstract line in the presentation. It's work, commute time, access to services, the decision of a young household to stay at home.
Therefore, any resignation or hold in time should be explained directly. How much does a change cost? Who made it? erstwhile will the region get a real connection? Without these answers, we have a typical illness of the Polish state: after the election the sign changes and the citizen is to wait patiently for a fresh concept.
Sovereignty starts with tracks
There's no vacuum in the infrastructure. If Poland does not build its own nodes, its own connections and its own logistics system, it becomes an addition to systems built elsewhere. This concerns ports, railways, airports and industry. economical sovereignty does not end with a password. She requires concrete, tracks, tenders and consequences.
In the background is besides the issue of control over Polish railway facilities. The discussion on packages, contractors and infrastructure companies is not a technology for the industry. erstwhile the state loses its influence on construction tools, it besides loses its cause. That's why it's worth going back to things like Torpol CPK package and public interest question.
Thus Adamczyk strikes a point delicate to the present power. The government can talk about modernity and evidence plans, but Poles request something simpler: proof that the state will not extinguish projects just due to the fact that they were created for predecessors. The nation pays taxes not to finance eternal communicative adjustments.
Poles request decisions, not decorations
CPK and high-speed railways are 1 of the things where political smallness costs a full generation. If the task is blurred in the following tables, Poland will lose time it will not recover. And time in geopolitics, economy and demography is the most costly currency today.
Therefore, the government should respond not with a slogan but with a document: what will arise when, for how much and who will be liable for delays. Without this, the communicative of large modernization will only be a well-lit scene. Poland needs tracks, terminals and connections. Not another image campaign.
Source: Radio Maryja, Ministry of Infrastructure.
Source: Radio Maryja
