Adam Bodnar to prosecutors: don't prosecute kid murder!

Attorney General Adam Bodnar issued guidelines on how to handle kid execution cases before they were born. In another words, he issued guidelines on the prosecution of abortion offences in Poland. And what precisely do we find in the guidelines? How NOT to prosecute abortion!

World-wide evolution

We have an issue on a global scale – the lawyer General, alternatively of investigating crimes, seems Guidelines on Crimes DO NOT pursue. The abortion crime lobby present has its lawyer general, due to the fact that in this position there is simply a individual who is comfortable with them. Bodnar's guidelines are a signal for abortion criminals: You do what you want, I'll push the D.A. not to come after you..

The very introduction of the paper is interesting:

The problem of abortion is constantly present in public debate, and the penal consequence to it is simply a controversial problem of criminal law.

It should be noted that this issue was introduced in 1920 by Vladimir Lenin, legalising abortion in the russian Union. Earlier, the legislators of any state in the planet had no uncertainty that infanticide should be prosecuted and punished.

Murdering a kid Not Harmful

The issuing of guidelines is simply a form of political force on the prosecutor's office, which, after all, has rules and is to act on them. In the meantime, Adam Bodnar instructs: you are to act in a way that does not take action, you are to strive to die. Absolutely scandalous is the 5th paragraph of the guidelines in which Bodnar states that abortion or assistance in it is an act of minimal social harmOh, my God! Yet, in no situation is attempted execution or attempted execution a low social harm act! What is the difference between a tiny kid and a somewhat older kid – does the criterion of kid size find whether execution is more or little harmful?

Before making substantive decisions, careful consideration must be given to assessing the degree of social harm of the action and, depending on the outcome, to considering the dismissal of proceedings due to the negligible degree of social harm of the action (Article 1(2) k.k.) or to mention the application for conditional remission to the court.

Kindness to the Murderer's lobby

The guidelines are intended to lead to a situation where those who execution or aid execution children will not endure consequences. This is the capitalisation of the state institutions, the resignation of the tasks that that institution should carry out. Clearly, the current prosecutor is in favour of ignoring abortion.

Attention should be paid to 2 another issues raised in the document: abortion for psychiatric reasons and abortion for criminal offences. The psychiatric message was indicated as 1 of the possibilities of life and wellness risks for pregnant women (sic!). And yet psychiatrist doctors They argue specified opposition matters.

Murdering children from (maybe) rapes

Perhaps even more outrageous is the seventh paragraph of the guidelines issued:

When there's a legitimate suspicion. That pregnancy was the consequence of a forbidden act. proceedings should be conducted rapidly so that the issuing of a certificate of legal abortion by the prosecutor is issued within a time limit allowing abortion to be terminated within a statutory period of 12 weeks cf. Article 4a(2) and (5) of the Act of 7 January 1993 on household Planning ( . . . . ).

It is only for the court to find whether the kid has been conceived by a forbidden act. So killing a kid is to be done before the alleged perpetrator is found guilty! We have a simple way to abortion on request – it is adequate to say that there has been a rape, then the prosecutor is to issue a message as shortly as possible that there is simply a rape and ready. Even erstwhile the rape was not, the kid is murdered.

Harass doctors who don't want to kill

No less, he touches the paragraph, talking about punishing doctors for refusing abortion. Bodnar imposes on doctors-prolajers of the Regional Ombudsman for Professional Responsibility, the Ombudsman for Patient Rights and the National wellness Fund. All these institutions want to usage doctors to fear Refuse murdering children.

Meanwhile, modern medicine does not see a collision between the wellness of mothers and the life of their children. Abortion never saves a mother's life! Yet, any are so determined to kill that they will deliberately mislead everyone, execution children, and harm women who fear abortion. The question besides arises: erstwhile prosecutors go after doctors who want to treat alternatively than execution – how many large doctors will be punished and isolated from patients and how many patients will lose their wellness or even their lives due to the fact that they will lose good specialists?

Adam Bodnar wants to “educate”

In the summary of the guidelines, the lawyer General is clearly mocking. He proposes not to focus on the prosecution of crimes, but alternatively to focus on the education of society. due to the fact that the government has been trying to educate children since the beginning of this year about the fact that abortion is simply a law and should be legal. In turn an organization specified as the Life and household Foundation, which conducts educational activities and shows the actual face of abortion, is simply combated. However, it seems that Bodnar is all about this – to silence opponents of abortion, and to remove abortion from Polish law. In this way the state capitulates against criminals and encourages force against the most susceptible children.

Dramatic Effects of Failure

Unfortunately, the erstwhile government has paved the way for murderous guidelines. In 2022 the Life and household Foundation checked what it looked like in Poland to prosecute abortion crimes. The situation was not good, criminals were not effectively prosecuted despite reports. We encourage you to get acquainted with report. 150 000 citizens signed a citizens' legislative initiative Abortion is murder.That was expected to specify the rules to give prosecutors tools to prosecute infanticide. If the bill had come into force, present Adam Bodnar could not have mixed with the guidelines for his subordinates. Meanwhile, the bill was rejected at first reading. Thus, one more time the sin of omission contributed to an even greater evil. This time in the form of guidelines for killing children in the majesty of the law – the laws inactive heavy stifled. This is Poland Anna Domini 2024.

Text: Laura Lipińska