This jester is not a hucpa without precedent. 1 of Mexico's dictators erstwhile buried his leg, which he lost on the battlefield. 1 of Guatemala's dictators made a coup, then summoned all the accredited ambassadors there and ordered them to hang immediately. Is Mr Maduro (meaning "mature") a dictator? No uncertainty it is. He even paid an authoritative visit to Vladimir Putin in that role.
Every Latin American country, but possibly Costa Rica, was at least erstwhile a military dictatorship, and cruel, specified as Argentina, Chile, Uruguay or Nicaragua. Costa Rica hasn't, due to the fact that it hasn't had and hasn't had a military in over a 100 years. On the another hand, she had president Franciszek Picado Michalski, but he was a good emigrant. The Mexican Nobel Prize winner Carlos Fuentes, considered in his essays the conditions that the dictator needs to meet. There was never a dictatorship in the western hemisphere in the United States and Canada. In Canada, due to the fact that it was besides cold, in the United States, due to the fact that it passed distant with the wind, that means the American Revolution of the mid-19th century was besides bloody. This would mean that the future of Argentina, Chile, Uruguay and Nicaragua appears radiantly as a model democracy that abhors blood. But let's take our time with the conclusions. A Spanish-speaking past is needed for dictatorship and the culture of this erstwhile superpower (without atomic weapons). Italians (Krzysztof Columbus) discovered America (described by Amerigo Vespucci—from his name the name of the continent), but conquered the western Hemispher of Spain. They slaughtered the Aztecs and impregnated them with women. It was akin with the Incas in Peru. Mr Maduro has quite a few ancestors, due to the fact that they came from the army of Simon Bolivar, who started a national war of liberation against the Spaniards and Kreolos during the times of romanticism. Bolivia is simply a second generation war. Venezuela is officially called the Bolivarian Republic.
Carlos Fuentes asked fellow Latin American writers to describe each of them as their dictator. It's a large idea, but it's besides a bad idea. How can I put Borges and Ernest Sábato, Neruda and Victor Jara, Vargas Llosa and Gabriel García Márquez in 1 book, not to mention Cuban-Russian Avenue Carpentier and José Lezam Lima? Let's yet name Juan Rulfo and Fuentes himself?
Venezuelan writers were not invited to this project, possibly due to the fact that only 2 dictators were enrolled in their history, and their own writers were few. Venezuela in the 1960s during the reign of Social politician Perez and Chadek Campins began to be a prosperous state, but Caracas inactive lacked water, as García described in the dramatic coverage “Caracas without water”. These are everyday dramas. erstwhile the drought occurs in Orinoko, power plants in Wene zueli halt working. The description of drought in the tropics is simply a masterpiece.
Mr Maduro has been worried about this from dawn to night. He was a city bus driver, then a subway conductor. He became a union activist and admirator of Hugo Chávez, a military man who repeatedly came to power by the fall method. This is simply a common way in South America. The evidence holder is Bolivia, where so far there have been 280 military attacks. any are bloodless, but these are few. If generals enter the presidential palace, the organization is friendly. And if younger men come to the assassination – the blood pours abundantly. Chávez was a colonel, that is, neither a general nor a captain. They shot and killed hard, with Chávez treating himself little as a practice and more as a theoretical. He invented the socialism of the 21st century, but could not explain what it was. The trade unionist Maduro made abroad Minister and then promoted him to vice president. He stood in front of tv cameras all day and imitated Fidel Castro. He was severely sick and was then sent to Havana for treatment, where he died, and Maduro accused Cubans of murder. For Chávez, Venezuelans were poor, and for Maduro it is tragic for them. Socialism of the 21st century, which proved to be a mixture of socialism, populism and liberalism, has become a laughing doctrine. On the another hand, economical indicators fly down the head, around the neck. It's unusual that Venezuela has the world's largest oil reserves.
