Until recently, the axis of the dispute between the environments defending the conceived life and the advocates of abortion seemed clear: whether the embryo is simply a separate man from the mother, or a part of the woman's body, and as specified it can be treated by her, specified as hair or nails – removed and thrown away. The question was besides asked, "When does human life begin?" In this dispute, the proabortion movement seemed to reject the facts and state of cognition of modern biology, genetics or medicine, promoting bizarre definitions of embryo nesting, fetus consciousness, etc. The last time you talk more about abortion, the masks go down and it turns out that these pseudo-scientific statements are just a smokescreen.
Abortion activists are not about whether embryo/foetal is human or erstwhile it becomes human. It is not even about protecting mothers of terminally sick children who, from a medical point of view, have no chance of surviving after childbirth. Abortion advocates simply request a alleged “on-demand” procedure, rejecting even the existing legal state, allowing the kid to be killed in certain situations, in peculiar erstwhile it comes to the threat of the mother's life.
Human? It doesn't matter.
Abortionists do not pay attention to the arguments that the “procurement” causes large suffering for the child, which can besides origin physical and intellectual complications for women. Natalia Broniarczyk admitted in a debate about abortion organised by the portal “Gonn” on July 18, 2024 that for her nested fertilized egg is already life, and for many women this life begins “with 2 lines on the test, but it is not about erstwhile a man starts, we can sit here for 30 years and have very different views, due to the fact that it is simply a question of value (...) and this aspect, whether it is simply a man or not, does not substance to them.” And that's where we contact on the heart of the matter. Yes, it is simply a substance of values professed, including respect for human life. That is why the law should be so designed that those who neglect to see themselves doing incorrect cease to do so due to sanctions. Just as the ancient, primitive Israelites received commandments that clearly spelled out how to proceed, so present it is essential to set a framework that stops lawlessness for those who do not want to admit the moral standards of our cultural circle.
You can find real-time statistic at worldometers.info. Under the motto abortions (i.e. "caused" embryo or fetus death) are a terrifying number of 30,545 360! This number grew at a rate indicating 2 or 3 abortions in each second! After clicking on the "abortions today" icon, the number 121 310 appeared to me (and continued to grow)... These amounts are absolutely shocking, especially erstwhile compared with, for example, the data on the victims of the First or Second planet War. Similarly, the information that the abortion activists of Dream Teamu (kresy.pl) prided themselves on freezing blood in their veins lasted 37 weeks, as Mr Sterczewski of KO said in the network: "Great pride! Bravo". I was born in week 38...
Worldview changes
In a survey conducted in January 2024 by IBRIS for “Rzeczpospolita” on draft laws by the Left and KO allowing abortion until 12 weeks of pregnancy, as many as 50.4% of respondents felt that “the proposed changes should be adopted by the Sejm”, 16% would like a referendum on this matter, and 20.8% felt that the current legal state should be left in place. Interestingly, among the PiS voters, support for these murderous projects was only 11%, and 44% among the Confederate voters. Przemysław Wipler recalled in October 2023 (drzeczy.pl) that he had data that among the electorate seen as a conservative organization of the Confederate, support for the legality of abortion by Week 12 reaches up to 58%, and that most of this electorate supports the legalization of euthanasia! These data confirm the amazing phenomenon of the many (48%) vote of Confederate voters on Liberal Worldview Rafał Trzaskowski in the fresh presidential election. specified an arrangement of convictions is most likely connected with the age of voters and, consequently, the attitude towards belief in God. The convictions of supporters of the “other side” of the political border do not surprise – among the voters of the ruling coalition support for the proposed liberalisation changes according to the said poll is very high, from 64% (Third Road), by 85% (KO) to 100% (Levice).
What would the results of the public opinion survey look like if the question was otherwise asked, stressing support for the protection of life alternatively than support for killing? Katarzyna Gęsiak, manager of the Center for Medical Law and Bioethics Ordo Iuris, presented on the Institute's website the results of a survey carried out on his behalf and compared them with erstwhile studies: "(...) CBOS, United Surveys and IPSOS polls investigated the phenomenon of support for abortion, which is, in fact, the degree of condoning evil, which mostly means depriving people at the prenatal phase of development. Instead, they did not take into account attitudes that could be described as positive, that is, expressing support for the protection of life. However, this does not mean that specified studies were not carried out at all. The IBRIS was liable for verifying social attitudes in this area, conducting investigation on behalf of the Ordo Iuris Institute: in May 2016, in February 2019 and then in January 2023 (...). The results of the IBRIS survey of 2023 showed a decrease in the percent of Poles supporting the protection of life since conception (45% versus 60.4% in the 2019 study) and a decrease in the number of people advocating the ban on abortion while maintaining the anticipation of saving the life of their parent (35% compared to 57.9% in 2016). There are surely many factors, but it cannot be excluded that they belong to a loud, vulgar and populist but false message about abortion of the alleged women's strike, organised after the Constitutional Court issued its judgement on 22 October 2020. It seems that specified events, which for any participants were a form of amusement and chance to express their discontent with the long-standing lockdown, as part of the state's anti-covid policy, they peculiarly marked the attitudes of young people, inactive in 2019 with a vast majority (more than 75%) advocating the protection of life.
Although the results of the survey showed a downward trend of support for the protection of life at the prenatal phase of human improvement in relation to 2016 and 2019, at the same time they show that as many as 45% of Poles are inactive in favour of this affirmative request to defend life to the full, despite the increased activity of the public pro-abortion environment for over 2 years."
Education and technological approach
Abortive Dream squad boasted that in only the second year of its activity, it allowed access to 44 000 abortions, including 1,200 women in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters of pregnancy obtained aid to go abroad to execute abortion (krasy.pl). These figures are, of course, much higher than the authoritative data published by the Ministry of Health, which is due to abortion tourism, but besides to the promotion of abortion self-service, i.e. the self-killing of a kid conceived at home with tablets. "The interruption of pregnancy by a pregnant individual is not punishable in Poland. You don't gotta worry about the legal consequences. It is only crucial that you order pills from your email and pay a donation from your bank account” – convince left-wing activists on their websites. The films and stories of people who have previously been active in the abortion manufacture show the massity of this practice performed not only in the event of the threat of the mother's life or of the child's fatal malformations, but besides in the case of healthy children.
In the light of these testimonies, the intent of the abortion manufacture is not people's welfare, but comfort and making money. any abortions are straight eugenic – “reductions” of multi-fertile pregnancies are carried out, where the weakest or most convenient for this gruesome procedure is killed, to improve the conditions of the remaining foetuses and to reduce the hazard of premature delivery. But how can young women not realize the horror of their own actions? In an article by Łukasz Sośniak SJ entitled "In the fight against abortion manufacture education is the most important", published on vaticannews.va in December 2021, we read that according to an American activist pro-life Brooke Stanton, the abortion manufacture for more than half a century “dark and distorted technological facts concerning human development”. What were the consequences? According to Stanton, young Americans had very limited cognition of the subject: “23 percent of those aged 18 to 22 feel that human life begins at birth. Only 9 percent of young Democrats realize that the human body begins to be at the time of conception."
Brooke Stanton worked on spreading technological cognition about erstwhile human life began, due to the fact that according to polls, learning the facts had a bearing on changing attitudes towards abortion among Americans. In the 2019 march for life, activists marched under the motto "Pro-life is pro-scientific’. Since the introduction of this strategy in many states, procedures have begun to improve abortion law. However, the approach to this issue among any Americans inactive shocks – during the fresh Democratic Convention, on which Kamala Harris was to be officially nominated as a candidate for the office of president of the United States, the organizers in consultation with Planned Parenthood provided for their sympathizers "abortionbus" in which pharmacological abortion, vasectomy and access to "emergency contraception" could be performed free of charge. The Wieners ellipse restaurant offered customers this mobile “clinic” coupon for a free hot dog...
Demagogy of the Left
Although it would seem that no 1 can uncertainty the fact that an fertilized egg is simply a man in the early phase of development, ignorance (or deliberate manipulation) is inactive well. PSL MP Michał Kamiński in Polish Radio on 25 July 2024 argued that there is no discipline that would state that the fertilized cell is simply a man the same as he talking to a journalist; and that talking about it in this way is only a domain of Catholic faith. It is hard to agree with this statement, due to the fact that there are fields of discipline that contradict the Member's theory. Of course, given the appearance and developmental features, neither the fetus, nor a 3-month-old baby looks, does not think and does not behave like an adult man, but does not do so besides an 8-year-old boy or teenager – these are just people in different stages of development.
We know that the DNA of the conceived organism is different from the DNA of the mother. So it's a separate organism whose genome, of course, points to a species. homo sapiens. Is this conceived organism human? What are the current findings of discipline on the origins of human life? A description of processes, mechanisms and factors liable for the formation of the organism is provided by embryology. 1 of the most popular textbooks for learning this subject, which students of medicine in Poland are eager to use, is “Embriology of Langman” by Thomas W. Sadler, first published in the 1960s. It is worth noting that the 2015 Polish edition was translated by a number of professors, while the preceding edition reads: “The last first edition Langman’s Medical Embryology is 1 of the world's best textbooks dedicated to biology and human improvement medicine. It is simply a modern work that contains information based on the latest achievements of biology and molecular medicine." It is therefore, by all means, a professional origin of information about human development. The manual contains many wordings that leave no uncertainty that the natural phase of the improvement of the fertilized cell is the kid – man.
Consider a fewer quotes: “In 9 months a kid is born from a single cell. (...) The improvement of the body begins with fertilization, a process in which the male gamet – sperm – and the female gamet – oocyte – combine to form zigota. (...) Implantation occurs at the end of the first week of pregnancy.” In the issue of implantation, it is worth noting that this apparent fact contradicts the thought promoted by the pro-abortion ideology that pregnancy only began with embryo implantation, alternatively than with fertilization of the cell (such a "new" definition of pregnancy was needed by proponents of the pill "day after" to advance the thesis that the usage of embryo implantation preparations is not an abortive effect due to the fact that it did not happen yet, but only to fertilize).
In the manual, there is besides a deadline conceptus, meaning the conceived organism at any phase of development, from conception to birth (including fetal membranes). The next apparent conviction for life defenders is in Chapter 6: “The embryonic period (embryonic period) is mostly considered to be the earliest phase of human improvement (!) lasting from fertilization to the end of the eighth week of pregnancy”. The modern academic textbook so uses the word “man” alternatively than the word “cell clump”.
Body yes, individual no
So there is no uncertainty that from the point of view of discipline the conceived organism is human. Supporters of abortion so brought forward a fresh artillery – conceptus He's human, but is he a person? “Does anyone truly believe that the embryo is full human?” – asks sociologist Stanisław Krawczyk in his (terrible) article published in October 2020 on the portal Oko Press. The author claims that calling abortion “killing people” is possible only through simplifications and omissions or manipulations. ‘It is simply a completely legitimate position to recognise an embryo or fetus — at least in the first 2 trimesters of pregnancy — as an organism but not a person’, states Krawczyk, ‘Human-Organism and person-person These are 2 different concepts," he argues. It is based on the unreflexively utilized presumption that individual position is determined solely by brain activity. Therefore, since brain activity in the embryo is not present, it cannot be human-person, nor can a patient with “brain death” occur; a patient who, therefore, seems to be no longer a person. The author even quotes from John Paul II: "The complete and irreversible cessation of all brain activity, if strictly applied, does not seem to conflict with the essential assumptions of reliable anthropology."
However, Krawczyk omitted the most crucial component of the quoted medical criterion of ending life – the cessation of brain activity must be irreversible! [Read also: medicine or business? Death criteria contradict the principles of science]. In the case of life conceived, this criterion is unfulfilled – in a healthy embryo brain activity will surely appear and develop. "A full human cannot be an embryo or fetus whose tense strategy has not yet developed to specified an degree as to let pain or any another form of consciousness to be felt. This, in turn, occurs only during the 3rd trimester of pregnancy, or at the end of the second" - Krawczyk argues, entering the areas of doctrine and ethics.
The question of the level of consciousness, especially in the conceived organism and in the light of insufficient technological knowledge, is immeasurable for us. After all, no scientist can return to an early prenatal state to clearly examine the degree of feeling stimuli or the level of awareness for this phase of life. technological information in this area is simply a conclusion based on the construction of anatomical structures and behavioral observations, and the evolution of views on foetal pain in fresh decades, made thanks to improved diagnostic tools (e.g. USG 4D) indicates how much ignorance we have been inactive late and most likely inactive are. "The exact nature of the experience of fetal pain remains unknown and may stay unrecognizable forever," writes experts (Derbyshire, Bockman). But the publicist of the Eye Press authoritically speaks of consciousness and pain by the fetus, as if everything was already clear, with pride and without caution recommended erstwhile it comes to human life.
Similarly, the question of the human individual is treated superficially in specified narratives – this issue is discussed abundantly in doctrine and expressed in various ways. There are many definitions with which to agree or argue with. For example, in Aristotle's concept, adopted by Tomism, a individual defined a reasonable soul. For John Paul II simply “man is simply a person.” Formulating a person's definition solely on the basis of his physicality or earthly accomplishments, with the omission of the metaphysical dimension and soul issues, is simply a large simplification.
To illustrate the worldview of the abovementioned writer Oko Press, I would add that he accuses activists pro-lifethat they do not focus their efforts on the impact of air contamination on the number of abortions. He writes: “(...) excess nitrogen dioxide in the environment has akin effects as smoking cigarettes during the first trimester of pregnancy. There are surely more of these factors, but people who describe themselves as pro-life in their public activity, they are not curious in reducing the scale of already identified threats (which would prevent the deaths of embryos and foetuses much more effectively than tightening the Polish abortion law)".
Does the fetus feel pain?
It is worth noting that, in the light of the latest neurological evidence, the position established so far about the deficiency of pain by the foetus until the second trimester of pregnancy can no longer be considered credible. There have been indications that there is no request to have developed cerebral cortex for perception of painful stimuli. Moreover, there are besides positions that say that the deficiency of sufficiently developed bark is simply a origin that increases pain and can be felt at a more "raw" level. In another words, we know for certain that the fetus feels pain during the second trimester of pregnancy and there are indications that the fetus is suffering during the first trimester of pregnancy. investigation continues, and the evolution of views on this issue should lead us to far-reaching caution and not exposure the conceived organisms to unnecessary suffering. The latest findings of discipline call into question the alleged painlessness of abortion for foetuses in the first trimester of pregnancy and confirm its pain for foetuses in further stages of pregnancy. Of course, this is simply a secondary problem in the context of the moral dimension of the act itself of killing the conceived child. However, he illustrates his incredible cruelty.
Age of pregnancy – certainty or guess?
The author of the Handbook on Embryology points out that embryos of the same age can make at different rates. So they can show differences in the rate of growth of certain structures. This is crucial for determining the age of pregnancy. In many women, the regulation determining the age of pregnancy based on the date of last menstruation has limited application. This age is then determined or corrected on the basis of an ultrasound examination which is not always accurate adequate to find the age of pregnancy perfectly by day – this age is estimated, administered approximately. Specialists agree that ultrasound measurement during the first trimester of pregnancy is the most accurate method to find or confirm the age of pregnancy. However, it is besides subject to an mistake of +/- 57 days. The accuracy of the assessment of the age of the foetus based on ultrasound studies and measurements in later trimesters is even little (+ 7 to 14 days in the second trimester and +/- 21 to 30 days in the 3rd trimester). Meanwhile, in Parliament's pending abortion law projects, there are various temporal cesurias, e.g. 12 weeks or 24 weeks of pregnancy (the applicants believe that at this point the fetus achieves the ability to live independently outside the woman's body).
There is so a dilemma of an ethical (and legal) nature: can we say with full work that a pregnancy, whose age we know only roughly, meets the conditions imposed by the legal caesura of the age of pregnancy qualifying for a "legal" abortion, as foreseen by the pending draft laws? Can we clearly separate between a pregnancy lasting 11 weeks and 6 days from a pregnancy lasting 12 weeks and 1 day, since the parameters on which the calculation can be made may not let specified precise measurement? What is equality with a law in which 1 individual enjoys legal protection, and a being younger by 1 day or even half a day, no longer? Is it possible to mistake the exact age of pregnancy? And finally, the hardest question is: is it possible, since the margin of mistake is so lavishly scratched, that the age of pregnancy can be deliberately understated?
In the context of a ‘back door’ intellectual wellness condition allowing abortion to happen at any time, these temporal caesiums for abortion are possibly little important. However, they are the ones indicated in the current law and planned to debate projects. Recommendations and guidelines, so far, do not constitute a origin of law.
‘Creating’ lightning
Faith in God takes an highly crucial place in views on abortion. It allows us to realize that all man is God’s creation, that everyone deserves to be born and baptized. This perspective, however, has been distorted by years of left-wing indoctrination, generating nihilist attitudes and condoning hedonist needs, and the designation of religion and the Catholic Church by pop culture and mainstream media as “obtrusive” relics worshiping superstitions, protecting paedophiles or imposing “inhuman” principles. Although even liked by the "left-wing" elite, Pope Francis says abortion is evil, this voice does not prevail even in Christian environments – there are people who do not see contradictions in going on pilgrimages and simultaneously supporting black protests. This attitude is hard for me to realize and multiplies questions: is it a question of "deepness" and sincerity of faith?; the weakness of Shepherds?; is our country becoming Sodom and facing punishment?; will there be a fewer righteous and individual who negotiates with the Lord God?...
Today, the voices of the hierarchy of the Church, specified as those expressed in the homily in 2005, by Bishop Stanislaw Napiera from the Diocese of Kaliska, do not scope the public enough. He powerfully condemned abortion, leaving no uncertainty about the Catholic Church's position on this issue (source: świętyjozef.kalisz.pl): – In the process of human development, like any surviving being, there are 2 moments, or alternatively 2 utmost stages, which mark the beginning and the end. The beginning is conception, the end is death. (...) – He said hierarch.
– I am deliberately recalling here the fact of human development, of improvement extending for many years. In the light of this truth, the decisive importance of the first phase of conception is distinguished. A man in this stage, thanks to modern technology, becomes “watchable”. You can observe from week to week the individual parts of the human body. This is simply a view that allows us to see ourselves in the beginning of existence. For each of us was at this phase of existence and life. It is simply a sight that unleashes in a man the instinct of caring for a helpless human being. It is simply a sight that disarms in man the sinister thoughts and feelings, in order for them to be replaced by the request to hurry with the aid of a developing small man-- The bishop pointed out.
– Knowing this, it is hard to find words that express the evils associated with the taking on life of a human being in the first phase of its existence and development. What do you call this evil? Indulgence? Cruelty? Unfortunately, this is happening where something called abortion is done. Abortion – an innocent sounding word. Let's open it! Let's look inside. Let us look into the eyes of the fact in him. And the fact is terrifying. The fact contained in abortion is the body torn into pieces, dripping in blood. The body of a man killed in the first phase of his development. individual who dares to show publically the hideous fact of abortion on respective photographs was wanted to justice the punishment for the “dragness of photographs”. It's not pictures that are drastic. Dramatic is the reality of the pictures they depict. This reality, erstwhile it starts screaming through images showing it in pictures, accuses and cries for vengeance to heaven. Of course, this reality deprives the well-being of all those who, in the killing of the most innocent helpless, dip their hands – pointed out the shepherd of the Kali diocese.
The clergy further developed a very crucial issue of moral co-responsibility for the crime of alleged abortion. “Many people and institutions of modern society are active in the killing of abortions, which are professed to be civilized. These include first those who legislate, who find the conditions and the way abortion takes place. How humiliating and pathetic the run for parliament was. any candidates in their program were betting on abortion. seemingly they are convinced that there will be voters who will vote on them. All those who do it in any way are active in the abortion killing. There are doctors among them. They know what they're doing. They see human remains dripping in blood. They see this blood on their hands. That's terrible. The abortion killing is attended by those who urge or search it for their child, for their grandson, for their relative. All who participate in abortion are liable for the death of innocent human beings. Don't let them think they're justified by their right to abortion. There is no specified law, due to the fact that it cannot be. No parliament has the power to constitute a law that would let the killing of a individual at any phase of its existence and development. Those active in abortions are liable to God – the donor and the Lord of life. They're besides liable to the people they killed. After all, human beings who are deprived of life in abortion do not cease to be after being put to death. And there, on the another side, there will be a meeting. Those who have given them life and contributed to the failure of their lives will see each other. Bishop Napiera informed.
Unfortunately, the hierarch made a mistake in 1 conviction – he judged the morality of the Polish people besides highly and doubted that there would be voters willing to vote for politicians who wrote the right to abortion in their programs...
Analysis of changes in social attitudes towards abortion consent, especially among young people, shows how crucial the work of centres and associations referring to Catholic tradition, indicating the evil of abortion, straightening out facts about abortion, publishing sound technological cognition and promoting attitudes pro-life. The continued presence of life defenders in public debate, and with it education of society, are essential in the face of a powerful, armed celebrity army and media pro-abortion lobby. The Holy Father John Paul II saw this necessity, who repeated his celebrated words in Kalisz: – A nation that kills its own children is simply a nation without a future. He besides said: – The right to life is not just a substance of worldview, it is not just a spiritual right, but a human right. The most basic human right. Civilization, which rejects the helpless, deserves the barbaric name – even though it has large economic, technical, artistic and technological achievements. And he appealed: – Therefore, there is simply a request for universal mobilisation of consciences and a collective ethical effort to implement a large strategy for the defence of life. present the planet has become an arena of conflict for life. There is simply a conflict between the civilization of life and the civilization of death. That is why it is so crucial to build a culture of life: to make cultural works and patterns that will emphasize the greatness and dignity of human life; to establish technological and educational institutions that will advance the real imagination of the human person, of the married life and of the family; to make an environment that embodies in everyday life the merciful love which God bestows upon all man, especially the suffering, weak, poor, unborn.
Adversary “without a clause of conscience”
There are provisions on the strategy for the coming years of 1 of the many pro-progender organisations: the aim will be to counter organised opposition to activities for alleged sexual and reproductive rights and broadly understood progressive values. "(...) The Foundation will aim to guarantee that legal regulations introduced at national and global level are free of content motivated by the ideology of the antigen. In addition, the aim of the actions of the Federation will besides be to form a social climate to gain widespread support for feminist actions and to reject the ideology of the antigen. The actions taken, whatever their form, will aim to accomplish at least 1 of the following overarching objectives of the Foundation's national spokesmen's activities: decriminalisation and liberalisation of the anti-abortion law and improvement of the quality of abortion care, which requires a change of law. (...) Between 2023 and 2028, the Federation will continuously monitor access to gynaecological care (including contraception, abortion, prenatal research, fertility treatment) and sexual education. At the same time, the Foundation will check the inclusion of these topics in the electoral committees' programmes. (...) The Federation will include professional actors, specified as anti-gender organisations and their activists or key politicians and chaplains of public positions. These groups are the most specialised and besides have crucial financial, personal, etc. resources. The impact on them will require more time-consuming actions, specified as the presentation of draft laws, legal opinions or specialist papers. The Federation will strive to gain support for its actions from key actors shaping the socio-political situation: politicians, state bodies, business representatives, media and global organisations. Impact on these groups, as above, will require professional and specialised tools. The aim should be to guarantee that the government prepared by decision-makers is free of the influence of the antigenic ideology, while those which straight concern the SRHR (sexual and reproductive wellness and rights) was co-created with the support of and under the substantive control of the Foundation or its partners; it would so be appropriate for the Federation to prepare draft laws and another papers or to participate in the work as experts. In addition, the Federation intends to form public opinion so as to deprive the anti-gender movement of possible support. In this communication, the goal will be to scope out to the undecided, so as to convince them to support feminism and progressiveism. This will require the appropriate formation of discourse and the imposition of subjects, for which petitions, appeals or social campaigns may be useful. Various topics and issues are more or little applicable to individual audiences. The Federation will strive to present the fight for anti-gendreism in categories specified as emancipation, relations of power, social justice or the issue of national interest. The national Center will be a modern facility, without a clause of conscience, without evaluation, without stigmatisation. The Centre will supply in the area of reproductive and sexual wellness everything that is missing in another places in Poland. We make a place where you can, among another things, get a prescription for contraception, including the so-called. Tablet (an emergency concept); [...] receive the certificates needed to halt the pregnancy in a Polish hospital.’
Ora et labora!
Federa's strategy was very disturbing.: "The tools by which the Federation intends to accomplish the above objectives are, inter alia, reports, legal opinions, positions, petitions, open lists or social campaigns. These actions seem to be adequate to implement the established strategies (...) to bring the Federation closer to its objectives.’
The enemy is awake, the fight is inevitable. Mobilisation is so essential. Each of us can avoid the sin of neglect and take advantage of the chance to do good, supporting the movement pro-life in various ways – by participating in marches, by donating donations, by disproving the false communicative of promoters of unborn murders or even by ‘discussing' on social media published by life-support organisations posts or articles.
Let us not forget our strongest weapon – prayer! In the Kalisz Sanctuary of Saint Joseph, especially on the first Thursdays of the month, the faithful bring to God through this Patron – the protector of life – a prayer "in matters of the highest importance of the life of unborn people and endangered families." Bishop Napiera in her 2005 homily said: – Isn't this our fight a utopia? Which of the large worlds will take our prayer to heart and decide to act against abortion attempts or to service families based on matrimony between men and women? In terms of purely human logic, prayer can be counted as utopia. But we carry it and carry it, and we will be firmly convinced of its power and effectiveness, which is not of men but of God. In this belief Jesus Christ strengthens us. The Gospel of this liturgy urges us to be steadfast in prayer. “And I say to you, Ask, and it will be given you; seek, and you will find; knock, and they will open to you. For everyone who asks receives; he who seeks will find, and he who knocks will open." (Lk 11.9-10).
Zofia Michałowicz
Stop the barbarism! We call for intervention after Żukowska's speculations about killing children
Click HERE to join the action
Stop the barbarism! We call for intervention after Żukowska's speculations about killing children
