A renaissance of cap grenades? Why do GNs have a chance for the future?

2s14.blogspot.com 8 years ago

I apologize in advance for specified a long period without a published article, however, it takes me so much now that I do not always have the time and strength to compose at least 1 conviction here. The hold is besides exacerbated by the fact that I had an almost ready article on the anticipation of resurrecting Komar in our army. However, after reasoning about it, I thought it would be much better to address the subject of cap grenades as a substitute for light anti-tank grenade launchers.

GNPO Cumulative Framing Pomegranate

Currently, 4 types of cap grenades are utilized in the Polish Army, which are adapted for firing from Kal outlet devices. 22 mm:

- I'm sorry. GNPO - HEDP cap grenade (photo)
- I'm sorry. NGZ-93 - Ignition cap
- I'm sorry. NGOS-93 - Lighting grenade
- I'm sorry. NGD-93 - Smoke cap

Many people in general forget about their existence of this category of infantry support, but due to the current "trends" concerning the improvement of anti-tank infantry grenades, I am inclined to thesis that cap grenades can play a large function in future infantry tactics alongside ppk and dense disposable RPGs.

On the another hand, however, the function of cap grenades has been so marginalized in the armies of the world, that with a candle you can look for fresh structures of this type, due to the fact that everyone focused on the construction of 40 mm grenades, which can be utilized with hanging grenades.

Comparison of grenadesóIn40 mm with grenades cap

Here you gotta start with the fact that M79 and 40x46mm grenades were created in the 1950s due to the fact that the American Army during the trench war On the Korean Peninsula, she stated that she needed a support weapon larger than hand grenades, but shorter than 60 mm mortars. The present measurement was the cap grenades, but they were due to the way The shooting was uncustomed.

Another advantage of 40 mm grenades is theircompactivitywhich allows Grenadier to carry even a twelve specified grenades, and Main weaponwhich currently uses this ammunition, there are suspended grenade launchers, which are mounted on automatic rifles.

On the another hand, 40 mm grenades have faults that can be utilized wisely by cap grenades.

First of them is weightede firearm kit-granter - in classical layout (magazine ind trigger) installation of the suspended grenade launcher moves the centre of gravity of the carbine forward, so It's a lot harder to fire. Yesand there is no defect erstwhile utilizing cap grenadesbecause in their case alternatively of weighing almost 1.5 kg of grenade launcher for the firearm barrel is pupatee tiny devicedeparturese. (on photograph below; on the barrel)

The second drawback - which is very crucial in the context of this article - the size of grenades. In the case of "40", tiny weights and sizes were placed, so the supply of ammunition for grenadier is large, but the force of firing these grenadesthe athem is small. The cap grenades are larger and heavier, making their blast force much greater.

On the subject of anti-tank grenadesThe case is as follows - American grenades 40x46mm M433 HEDP penetrate utilizing a cumulative stream parmour board of a thickness 62 mm, while Polish GNPO of the same diameter have penetration 80 mm RHA, mainly thanks the anticipation of utilizing more MW. Moreover, cap grenades can be strict anti-tank, due to the fact that HEDP insimultaneously make a cumulative stream against armored cells and shrapnel against forceThe effectiveness of the erstwhile is much weaker than HEAT.

And here I'm going to get to my concept.

KOnset of cap grenades against reinforced targets

In this case, I'd like to consider 2 different types of cap grenades to be utilized by our military, with at least 1 of them having a good chance for the future. The most crucial factors are mass, efficiency and range.

French anti-tank AC58 cap grenade

First tThe grenades would be HEAT grenades with a diameter 60 mm with auxiliary rocket enginem.

It is clear that HEAT ammunition is very effective against armored targets. and Fortified, but from the another Stream concentration causes Those grenades would be not effective against surviving purposes.

The second problem is to reconcile the weight of the grenade with its effectiveness.PI believe that the above grenadeIt'd be 350 to 400 mm RHA or gelet o twice the thickness, while the weight of the grenade would be about 1 kg. HelpfulRocket lance is essential here due to the fact that range gwound Without it, it would be a maximum of 100 metres.Sthe engine plan would be similar besides with RPG-76 due to his crucial advantages.

Anti-tank cap PGN-60

The possible alternate in this case wasYby HEAT cap grenades with a diameter 68 mmwhichConstructionaif get on the warhead Komara with introduced fashionications to destruct existing defects and possible A precursor. OvertakesPomegranate capacity would then increase by 50-60 mm RHA (without a precursor), but the grenade itself would be much heavier and It'd have a shorter range.

The second kind would be HEAT-HASH programmable grenades with a calibre 60-70 mm, besides with a rocket engine.

Construction of this grenadewould have been based on the plan of a warhead utilized in RGW 90 HH anti-tank grenade launchers. Unlike the classical HEAT, programmable head would have little effectiveness against armored targets (about 300 mm RHA), but thanks to possibleau head armaments as HESH A grenade would be much more effective against surviving targets. The remainder of the grenade elements would not be different from the first proposal.

Why would a cap grenade be better than a lightweight RPG?

Here, mention must be made to the current improvement of measures to defend armoured and mechanised weapons, namely ASOP. Like a dayYou know, These systems, which are mainly dedicated to protecting vehicles from anti-tank grenade launchers and ppk, are becoming increasingly popularwhich results in RPGs become obsolete as an anti-tank weaponbut their main function combating fortifications.

And here are the cap grenades - due to their parameters would be a good substitute for grAnti-tank pineapples. Moreover, grenades are much lighter than grenade launchers o similar parameters (M72EC weighs 3 kg, C90- I'm sorry.CR - almost 5 kg and AT4- almost 7 kg), can be fired from tiny closed surfaces, they do not request a tube to fire them and (mostly) they are cheaper than RPG. On the another hand they have lower accuracy than grenade launchers, but for fixed targets It does not play a major function for the strong.

Therefore, in conclusion, I considerthat The future of light anti-tank weapons are dense disposable anti-tank grenade launcherscapable of combating tanks from each sides and anti-tank pans for armoured purposes and reinforcementsIt.

You're free to go. I don't agree with you, I might be incorrect about that, but that's just my point of view.

Read Entire Article