Just as a communicative is being built about the existence of a fresh anti-Western "axis of evil" to include Iran, Russia and China, so is the request to build a strong defence alliance of states supporting Israel – "the only Western-style democracy in the mediate East". Competition between the 2 forming blocks is presented as a conflict to preserve a principled global order. However, the increasing opposition of the public to judaic politics puts many planet capitals in a hard situation.
Anti-Israeli protests
Since the Hamas attack on 7 October 2023 and defensive consequence Tel Aviv protests against Israel broke out on parts of American campuses. They intensified in mid-April, leading a fewer days ago to the arrest of over 2,200 students in fresh York and Los Angeles.
The opponents of the war demanded the cessation of bloody retaliation in Gaza and the cessation of American military aid to Israel. Protesters are annoyed that politicians and mainstream media fuel the “atmosphere of anti-Semitism” to cover up the genocidal practices of Netanjah soldiers.
Olives were poured into the fire by fresh York Rabbi Elie Buechler of the judaic Teaching Initiative at the Orthodox Union at Columbia University. In April, before the Passover, He sent a Message of WhatsApp to almost 300 fellow countrymen—students, recommending that they return home and stay there until it was safer on campus.
Several congressmen besides went to Columbia. They complained that they saw immense camps and anti-Semitic slogans calling for judaic students to return... to Poland (Sic!).
Universities in the United States have been facing protests for respective months. Following these demonstrations, 2 dean of the prestigious Ivy League universities were forced to resign from their positions. Higher school administrators are debating what to do with the increasing crisis. Protests besides include prestigious universities in Europe, mainly in the UK, France and Germany.
Senator Tom Cotton warned against the “pogroms” of judaic students at American universities. At Fox News, he argued that the scenes that take place there reminded him of “the images we saw in Germany in the 1930s”.
Opposition to the actions of the Israeli military is besides seen among the wider public, including in countries where support for Israel was almost always unconditional. Loudly and negatively about the “State located in Palestine” proceedings are spoken by intellectuals from left to right, including erstwhile U.S. ultimate Court justice Giorgio Napolitano, prof. Jeffrey Sachs liable for piloting the implementation of Agenda 2030, or a well-known American political scientist, typical of the realistic school, John Mearsheimer.
Western leaders took a clear stand, unconditionally supporting Israel immediately after the Hamas attack in October 2023. The United States, large Britain, Australia, France, Norway, Austria, Germany, India, Canada and Poland have proven to be the first countries to side with Tel Aviv. Palestinians were supported by Iran, Qatar, Turkey, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen and the arabian League. In May, the Turkish president – annoyed by the actions of the IDF troops – decided to suspend trade relations with Israel. In Egypt, Malaysia, but besides in another countries, opponents of war call for a boycott of companies doing business with Jews.
Tel Aviv mostly enjoys about 80 countries, while maintaining diplomatic relations with 165 countries of 193 that are members of the UN (December 2020 data).
A silent alliance of arabian states supporting US policy towards Israel
Although the State of Israel has no authoritative diplomatic relations with Saudi Arabia, this country has been drawn into a silent alliance with the US and another countries, including Jordan and Iraq, as well as the UAE, Qatar and Bahrain, which stood up for Israel against Iran's fresh rocket and drone fire.
The Jordanians claimed that they were actually protecting their interests and their airspace through which Iranian rockets flew, but do not support what Israeli soldiers do to Palestinians. Jordan, whose half of the population are Palestinian refugees, is dependent on the aid of the US, French and British. any mediate east countries, e.g. Saudi Arabia, Iraq, UAE, Oman and Bahrain, usage U.S. arms supplies. They besides aid Washington in pro-Israeli politics.
In the case of Western countries, a communicative is created about the request to defend democracy and the values of the West, which the Jews in Palestine are guarding. This communicative clashes with the current full actions of Israeli soldiers, who want to exterminate Palestinian militants at all costs – besides at the expense of many civilian casualties.
Dr. E. Ermin Sinanovic of the University of Shenandoah, who lectured, among others, at the Faculty of Political Sciences of the United States Naval Academy in Annapolis (Maryland), trying to explain the deficiency of condemnation by Western leaders of the "uncontested war crimes and violations of global law that Israel commits against Palestinians", points out that there are at least a fewer explanations of this phenomenon.
The scientist points out that the unconditional support for Israel is to be derived, among others, from the strength of the lobby of this state in the United States and in the West, as well as from Christian Zionism and the desire to "fulfill Western fantasies by Israel", which "dos to Palestinians what many Western political elites would like to do to Arabs and Muslims in general, but frequently cannot."
Christian Zionism versus Catholic Zionism
Apart from the question of alleged retaliation on the followers of Islam, Sinanovic draws attention to the strength of “Christian Zionism”, being “a long-standing part of Western Christianity, especially Protestantism”. He explains that for Christian Zionists in the United States the thought of Israel's rebirth is closely linked to the thought of destiny and akin to the American concept of uniqueness. Both countries are to be by God’s will, especially the State of Israel is to fulfill Bible prophecies.
It is worth mentioning that in 2019 prof. Gavin D’Costa, a theologian from the University of Bristol, advisor to the Episcopal Conference of England and Wales and the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue, pointed to the existence of something like ‘Catholic Zionism’, which evolved over the last half century and was to become part of the authoritative teaching of the Church.
In 2019, just before the publication of his book entitled Catholic Doctrines on the judaic People after the Second Vatican Council ("Catholic doctrine concerning Jews after the Second Vatican Council"), in an extended essay on the Mosaicmagazine.com website, the prof. recalled that despite the drastic decline in the indicators of belonging to the Church—and thus spiritual practices—the religion did not vanish as the secularists and liberals wanted. spiritual beliefs, however, evolve, especially erstwhile it comes to Catholic thought. D’Costa expressed hope that he would gain the meaning of the concept of ‘Catholic Zionism’, which would aid in a good attitude of about 1 billion Catholics to the State of Israel, as did ‘Christian Zionism’, mostly the Evangelican, helped form the politics of the British and American people towards Israel and Palestine.
The theologian besides recalled the function played by British Zionists – including number of Shaftesbury, abroad Secretary Arthur Balfour and Prime Minister David Lloyd George – and the Balfour Declaration issued in 1917, which contributed to the establishment of a judaic state in Palestine.
In the United States, among the evangelicals the thought of returning Jews to the Holy Land powerfully supported Methodist William Blackstone in 1891. He presented president Benjamin Harrison with a paper calling for her support. The appeal was signed not only by many Christian leaders, but besides by well-known public figures, from John D. Rockefeller and J. P. Morgan through senators, congressmen, and the Chief Justice of the ultimate Court ending.
The second, updated version of the Blackstone Memorial was later passed through justice Louis D. Brandeis to president Woodrow Wilson. His consistent support for the Balfour Declaration helped to realise the thought of creating a judaic state.
Over the last decades, the position of the American Evangelical has changed. It evolved from supporting the judaic state to regret that it meant Armageddon, or eventual cataclysm, a conflict between the forces of light and darkness (with Islam); a conflict culminated in the second coming of Jesus. fewer Protestant sects believe that the Redemption of the End will be accompanied by the voluntary conversion (some, many or all) of Jews to Christianity. Among the younger American evangelicals there is discontent and even hostility toward the judaic state.
Therefore prof. D’Costa has large hopes now for alleged Catholic Zionism, which is to have a different face from Protestant Zionism. He considered the year 1965 and the Declaration then issued as an impetus for its improvement Nostra Aetate, and in peculiar Article 4, concerning judaic religion.
Initially, the proposal for this provision was yet included in the Declaration Nostra Aetate. However, she met with hostility even before sharing the task with bishops. Its content “excurded” to the “New York Times”. The provisions of Article 4 were interpreted as supporting the State of Israel. Most mediate east countries, as well as the leaders of Christian communities from these countries, rapidly expressed their opposition to the project.
However, “to the rescue” – as the theologian writes – came the American bishops and Paul VI. The Pope proposed that the judaic religion should besides include references to Islam, in order to avoid accusations of political bias.
The text was yet established and then presented as part of the authoritative teaching of the Catholic Church. Most importantly, Nostra Aetate According to him, he officially renounces accusing the judaic people of crucified Jesus.
According to Prof. D’Costa, theology of Saint Augustine (who, although pointing out that the Jews had indeed lost their position as a nation chosen by God, and in fulfilling Bible prophecies were sentenced to the failure of their homeland, they had to be kept alive to roam the Earth as witnesses of the fact of Christianity) in their own way was an unintended bridge to fresh science. Vaticanum II, based on the fresh Testament text (Romans 11, 29: “For the gifts of grace and the call of God are irrevocable). This verse was to play a key function in a extremist change for the better in Catholic-Jewish relations, starting with the publication Nostra Aetate in 1965.
One problem, however, was the fact that the declaration made the judaic people “a museum relic” – connected in the Council text with Judaism from Bible and early Christian times, alternatively than with later rabbinic Judaism.
And that's the way. If, first of all, the Jews were not guilty of mass murder, and secondly, the gifts and promises made to them by God were irrevocab, would that not mean a fresh position for the judaic people, not only in ancient times, but for all times later? This issue was discussed during many debates after the Second Vatican Council.
Another crucial component in the creation of “Catholic Zionism” was John Paul II's speech in the German Mainz on 17 November 1980, followed by Benedict XVI's speech in the large Synagogue in Rome in 2006, or apostolic adhortation Evangelii Gaudium Francis of 2013. The present Pope went even further and he does not want to convert Jews anymore," noted the theologian.
The prof. believes that despite the many external and interior obstacles that request to be removed, everything indicates that “Catholic Zionism” is developing. Still, the reluctance of many Christians in the mediate East to the thought that the judaic nation remains a chosen nation, as rabbinic Judaism promotes. Many Christians in the mediate East, says prof. D’Costa, believe that the judaic people, after rejecting Jesus, are no longer "chosen," and that Christians now have the position of "new Israel," the people of God.
However, the biggest problem is the anti-Jewish traditions that cannot be changed overnight in the Catholic Church itself. “Catholic Zionism” is to be of large importance for planet peace and, according to the theologian, can so be included in the authoritative Magisterium of the Church. It will besides aid to recognise the legal and diplomatic position of Israel.
Nostalgia Behind Colonism
The support for Tel Aviv – according to Croatian prof. Sinanovic – is besides to be due to the nostalgia behind colonialism. Israel is to be seen as the "last European colonial institution in the mediate East". "When the anti-colonial conflict ended the European colonial task after planet War II, Israel emerged as a continuation of this dream – a nation overwhelmingly European, settled in the arabian world, oriented on subduing and eliminating indigenous peoples," writes the professor. He even argues that Israel does not control another countries, but that “the Western states usage Israel to accomplish their own political and strategical objectives.” The state established by the Jews serves as a powerful military base which does not gotta comply with global law, as it utilized to not apply to colonial powers.
The author besides suggests that the war in Palestine means, in a sense, an extension of the war declared to terrorism after the attack on the duplicate towers of the WTC in fresh York City on 11 September 2001.
Redemption for Holocaust
Finally, the support of European states for Israel is to be linked to the thought of redemption after the Holocaust, which is peculiarly visible in Germany, which has become highly pro-Israeli. Along with the United States and large Britain, Germany is the backbone of the Pro-Israeli alliance. "Even Jürgen Habermas, a celebrated German philosopher known for his promotion of global law, signed a message in which he first confirmed his support for Israel and ruled out the anticipation of this country committing genocide in Palestinians," we read.
Support for Hungary and the Visegrad Group
Hungarians are helping to build a pro-Israeli alliance. In July 2017, in Budapest, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu asked the Visegrad Group countries to aid improve Israel's relations with the EU erstwhile speaking with the microphone on.
Netanjahu complained about the "crazy" thought of Brussels, which made the strengthening of trade ties dependent on the resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. – The European Union is the only association of countries in the planet that makes relations with Israel – producing technology in all areas – dependent on political conditions. Only one. Nobody else does. – Netanjahu said, reminding that business with Israel want to do Russia, China and India.
The Prime Minister besides asked V4 leaders to support him in Brussels. – If you, as the Visegrad Group, could begin to present this concept, I think it would be... beneficial for you, but I think it would actually besides be beneficial for Europe as a whole. – noted Netanjahu, quoted by the agency Reuter, who reached the recording. And he added: – We are part of a European civilization. If you look at the mediate East, Europe ends in Israel.
According to the head of government in Tel Aviv, there is no logic in EU proceedings. – Europe undermines its safety by undermining Israel. It undermines its advancement due to the fact that it does not want contact with Israeli innovations due to an insane effort to make conditions (to make peace with Palestinians) – he said. According to him, Europe's relations with Israel will find whether the EU will "live and flourish or wither and disappear".
Brussels does not recognise Israel's sovereignty over the territory occupied by this state in 1967, besides over the West Bank of Jordan and Jerusalem, where the Palestinians would like to make their state. The Union besides criticises the construction of Israeli settlements in occupied territories and has taken steps to description goods produced in settlements in the West Bank.
At a press conference following a gathering with the Visegrad Group Prime Ministers, Netanyahu stated that it was time to redefine relations between Israel and the European Union, and stressed that Israel was "the only democracy in the mediate East, the only place where Christians are safe."
For his part, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban stressed that the EU should appreciate Israel's efforts to guarantee safety in the region. He besides called for greater rationality in relations between the Union and Tel Aviv.
Budapest favors the interests of the judaic “right”, hosting influential judaic lobby activists in the USA – AIPAC (American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee). This is the largest pro-Israeli lobby in America, as suggested by John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt in the book The Israel Lobby and American abroad Policy, is to push the United States to act contrary to their own interests.
Iranian Retaliation and Continuation of the conflict of Hamas is to cement the coalition
The fresh Iranian retaliation was to cement the pro-Israeli coalition about the anti-Iranian attitude – as suggested by Samuel J. Hyde of the judaic People Policy Institute. He explains that Israel has succeeded in breaking the pan-Arabic front and convincing adequate arabian states, including Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Qatar, that strong Israel is not a threat but a essential condition for their survival.
That is why he has a imagination that "the fighting axis is no longer moving between Israel and the Arabs," but "between the Arab-Israeli coalition, which he calls Osia Revivala and the muslim Revolution ajatollah and their terrorist agents, shamelessly calling themselves Osia Resistance".
He instructed the Israeli authorities to proceed their military action against the Palestinians alternatively of having peace talks so as not to "draw the historical chance to make a much more effective front against the muslim Republic of Iran".
Outside the US, the Visegrad Group countries and selected arabian countries are powerfully supported by the British. "The Telegraph" writes about the necessity to argue the anti-Western front, which is simultaneously anti-Israeli. Israel is to be the only successful Western-style “democracy” in the mediate East that irritates mediate east dictatorships. The war between Israel and Hamas, like the war of Ukraine and Russia, is seen as key wars by which Russia and Iran want to change the order of the world, and this cannot be allowed.
Support for Israel is presented as a necessity to support certain values in the fight against civilization, even at the price of a crucial number of civilian casualties among Palestinians.
Unconditional U.S. support
Israel could always number on the United States. After the Israeli troops defeated the coalition of arabian states in 1967, Washington recognized Tel Aviv as an attractive ally who did not let the conflict with arabian countries to turn into a greater war with the USSR erstwhile the US was occupied in Vietnam and did not have adequate resources to engage militarily in the mediate East.
The developing cooperation from the 1980s and 1990s in the field of weapons research, improvement and production led to the signing in 1999, for president Bill Clinton, the first of 3 10-year memorandums requiring America to supply multi-billion-dollar military assistance to Israel all year.
After the assassination of the WTC, this money helped make Israeli surveillance and intelligence technology, which at 1 point matched American intelligence.
In 2011, Israel implemented an antimissile defence strategy of the Iron Dome, which uses radar technology to destruct rockets fired by Hamas and another militant groups. The strategy is partially funded by the US.
Israel is presently receiving US military aid of $3.8 billion per year under a memorandum signed in 2019 (16 percent of Israel's full military budget for 2022). Washington wants Israel to stay a military power, better than any another regional army.
Tel Aviv develops its own advanced production capabilities and is the tenth largest exporter of military equipment in the world, now making the US dependent on the production of selected components. The military complexes of both countries are closely linked.
Israel is to be the central pillar of the integrated, prosperous and safe mediate East system, in line with the American concept of stabilisation of the mediate East. This included the Abrahamic Agreements concluded for president Donald Trump. They were intended to lead to Israel's trade relations with arabian countries, in peculiar Saudi Arabia. The war in Gaza has complicated it.
Although the United States would like Israel not to massacre Palestinians, it does not usage the weapons it receives from the United States to scandalous actions that rise widespread opposition to the public in the world, yet Washington and the Western establishment refrain from powerfully condemning Israelis, recognising that in the face of the formation of a fresh "axis of evil" and the request to build a wide alliance, civilian losses among Palestinians are an acceptable price of support for Israel.
"Western Soyusz" is presently active in a number of related regional battles. The network of states opposes in Ukraine, Palestine or the Indo-Pacific area attempts to change planet order by Russia, Iran and China.
Washington, who lacks military and economical resources to lead a opposition against enemies simultaneously in Asia, Europe and the mediate East, wants to strengthen deterrence, without straight engaging the US in war with any opponents of the axis. Thus, the direct burden of fighting is frequently passed on to allies on the front line.
At present, the concept of a tight Ukrainian-Israeli alliance supported militarily by the Caucasian countries, including Azerbaijan and the Pacific States, including South Korea with a strong defence industry, is besides being promoted.
Agnieszka Stelmach
