Monarchy. This word is associated with the long-lost times and possibly the expected dark ages. Meanwhile, queens and kings reign in 20 percent of the world. On the occasion of the anniversary of the Constitution on May 3, it is worth remembering the most crucial "proofs" in favour of a monarchy form of government.
Tradition and Continuity
Tradition and continuity are basic arguments for the monarchy system. Monarchic dynasties prevail for centuries and supply continuity not only to political order but besides to cultural order. 1 might even say that the monarchy is somewhat more democratic. It takes into account both past and future generations.
Even citizens of modern, “progressive” states, specified as Britain, realize this. They have large respect for the monarchy, no substance who presently wears the crown. We observed this occasion of Elizabeth II's ceremony and the coronation of Charles III, erstwhile the eyes of the full planet were turned to Britain.
"Mistically-religious respect, crucial to a actual monarchy, is simply a creative sentiment that no government can fabricate," notes Mark Easton at BBC.com. The British writer compared the respect of the monarchy to a theatrical spectacle in which the ruler plays the main role."
Interestingly, even in Republican states, specified as Poland, any elements of the monarchy tradition have been preserved. This can be observed even erstwhile sworn in as president. The head of the Polish state swears on a calligraphed copy of the Constitution, pays homage to memorial boards and participates in the Holy Mass in the Archathedal Basilica. The president then accepts the insignia of power. At the same time he becomes the Knight of the Order of the White Eagle, the Grand Master of the Order, as well as the president of the Chapter of the Order of the Rebirth of Poland.
This rich symbolism surely has something in it from the coronation. And the respect the head of state enjoys is mostly greater than that of average politicians.
Family values
Another asset of the monarchy is its connection to household values. The monarch state is headed by a household and it is at the centre of the attention of the subjects. present it is essential to add that it is simply a conventional family. Homosexual or non-fertility relationships will not guarantee the offspring and continuity of the dynasty.
Furthermore, in the erstwhile Europe, the Monarch families were 1 large family. The common relation or conligation provided for the maintenance of close ties and importantly protected from devastating wars. In the monarchy, it was possible to extend the territory peacefully through political marriages. As the Habsburg saying says, “bella gerant alia, this is Felix Austria nube” – “Let others lead, you happy Austria, marry.”
This "international" monarch ruled out national chauvinism. The second began with the French revolution, overthrowing the monarchy. He was besides active in a mass enlistment to the army to lead full wars. These did not coincide with the dawn of the democratic era (XX century).
Austrian author and erudite Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn (1909-99) aptly emphasized the link between the monarchy and the family. He noted that “because of its inherent patriarchism, the organic monarchy fits into the church and household pattern of Christian society. The relation between the king as the father of the homeland< and the people is simply a relation of common love," he wrote. (Freedom or equality, p. 155).
Economic arguments
Apart from the ethical and cultural advantages and political power of kings, it is besides economically advantageous. In the medieval patrimonic monarchy, the king owned his country. Today, of course, it is hard to talk of the monarch's full right of ownership to the full country. Nevertheless, the rulers are closer to the owner than the democratic administrator. The erstwhile – in the hereditary monarchy – intends to leave its office to children and grandchildren. Sam besides practically has a warrant (greater or little depending on the kind of monarchy) of power for the remainder of his life. As a result, its time horizon is much longer than the democratically elected prime minister or president.
For this reason, there are differences in the reasoning of the state. The Democratic admin has only a fewer years of re-election. It is so not intended to increase the long-term welfare of the state. Much greater benefits can be gained in another ways. For example, by granting themselves excessive apanases or handing over lucrative public positions to household and friends. The anticipation of re-election through shortsighted methods, specified as debt borrowing, is besides a large temptation.
The affirmative relation between monarchy and financial work illustrates research. In 2015, Standard&Poor's credit rating agency compared 129 countries, including 39 monarchies. The authors of the analysis noted that the average credit rating of the monarchy was A- Meanwhile, the average for republics is 3 points lower (between BBB a BBB-).
Interestingly, the authors of the analysis noted that there were no crucial differences between parliamentary and absolute monarchies. In a way, even the second do better. However, this may be due to the location of most of the absolute monarchies surveyed in the wealthy arabian countries.
However, mostly better creditworthiness of monarchs is no coincidence. This is due to the long - word position of kings.
Beauty...
Have you always heard of fairy tales, fairy tales, myths or legends about prime ministers, MPs or presidents? Of course not. Even the creators of scripts from modern labels, specified as the authors of the Lion King do not present stories about Republican regimes. For they do not want to bore nor to disgust the viewers. It's all due to the fact that the monarchy is simply a strategy more beautiful than the republic. The insignia of power, the union of monarchy with family, the archetypical figures of a wise king and a good queen, are only the chosen manifestations of this. It is no accident that the royal palaces inactive belong to the favourite tourist facilities.
In turn, the democratic strategy is commonly associated with quarrels, corruption and fraud. No 1 is amazed that politicians regularly get to the very bottom of the rankings of the most despised professions.
Writer and poet Andrzej Stasiuk points out: “I have always been in favour of kings and emperors, that at this mediocre time I peculiarly miss them due to the fact that democracy does not satisfy aesthetic or mythological desires, and man feels somewhat alone erstwhile he has to watch on tv his presidents elected in the general election.” 2 essays about Europe called Central).
...and modesty
In today’s egalitarian era, the monarchy raises opposition to the alleged excessive splendor associated with it. Although there have been (and have been) monarchs overly attached to luxury, specified a kind of regulation is not a rule. On the contrary. The essence of the conventional European monarchy is better reflected in the example of Saint Louis IX, king of France.
One day 1 of the monks visited the palace. The accepting husband of God monarch pointed to his simple clothing. “Sire, we learn from Christ, who led a humble and humble life. Our robes are an expression of our interior modesty and devotion to God," the monk replied. Louis IX looked at his own garments and decided to follow his example. “If I, the king of France, cannot show humility to God and my subjects, what kind of king am I?” he said. Since then, he has been dressed with dignity, but modestly.
Here is an example – 1 of many – of a monarch rooted in higher values.
Stanisław Bukowicz
