It's from the text. Monica Walus in Onet. Quote from the conversation in Kraków Błonia during the Confederate rally. late collecting signatures on Nadwiślańskie boulevards in Warsaw, I had akin conversations, seeing how most of the young people there are in the belief that the actual and credible opposition in Poland is the Confederate. It was striking and very real for me, first of all, this conviction quoted here. But I am writing to you, voting for the Confederate (and I will compose constantly, trying to scope you), due to the fact that yes, I have rather a lot to offer “those young men”. And young women too.
There's no specified party. It is besides not fresh Left, from which I run as an independent candidate. For it is impossible for a left-wing apartment, which is simply a right, not a commodity, to pierce the home and 2 cars promised by the Confederate. But most of all, that's not the point. Not due to the home and 2 cars, young people want to vote for the Confederacy. It is more about wanting to "turn over the table". Or possibly not about that – I compose to those who want to. due to the fact that I have it.
I know you well.
4 years ago, erstwhile I competed for the legislature against those who supported the Confederacy in the parliamentary elections. 30,000 of your votes. This is more than Krzysztof Bosak received in the parliamentary vote. Did you know?
This will not happen again easy – then you voted for me to spite PiS and Platform without having your own candidate. But I met many of you on the streets of Warsaw. This is no typical attempt, no poll – just the people I ran into, collecting signatures, handing out flyers, etc. However, this is besides quite a few focus (well over a 100 people), which allows a lot to be understood, especially since the talks followed a recurring pattern from which there were no exceptions. So you are frequently a small bit more right than the "national average" – but you have different views and they are not the most crucial to you. It is frighteningly common for you to have a variety of racism revealed – but it is not a rule, besides from the "national average" does not stand out very much and never occurs in a fierce character characteristic of, for example, Braun, whom the Confederate decided to hide during the campaign. It is even more common for you that the social egotism of the "Libertarian" is characteristic of them, who feel no solidarity with anyone and naively think that they request the state for nothing. Kaja Godek is an exotic lunatic, but you value her commitment and honesty. You justice Braun only in psychiatric terms, but he seems sincere and, in fact, harmless in his insanity. Korwin-Mikke is completely incomprehensible to many of you – so much you know about him that erstwhile you were born, he already walked in the same idiotic bow tie and told the same androns. Standing in views – you say – respect!
What you have in common is the conviction that you request to "turn over the table". You don't say "fuck the system!" due to the fact that it's old-school, left-wing, once-punk call, and although you don't remember these days, language and its deep meanings last longer than changing generations.
Well, I feel the request to "turn over". I realize her sources. I've devoted a lot to this at different times in my life and lately, too. I besides know the communicative and I know that turning the table usually ends just as Grzegorz Braun and another Confederate "stars" predicted. Democracy, which does not work, will be replaced by, for example, brown elements. erstwhile upon a time, behind the 7 mountains and forests, all feared the red elements. 1 might wonder which 1 is worse – but why? You should realize my swinging of my hand and neglecting the details, even if in fact these details are critically crucial – you should realize this especially you who shout that “PiS – PO, 1 evil”, not caring about the facts. You are called “antisystemists”. And that's who you are. Kaja Godek, Grzegorz Braun, Mentzen's bullshit posing as a taxation expert, Korwin-Mikke yet – all these are secondary things for you. Well, they won't be secondary erstwhile you let the full Confederate Bureau of singularities into the Sejm and let them play key roles. No, it'll be top-notch.
If Mentzen is “anti-systemic”, I am young and beautiful. I will effort to tell you what “antisystemism” truly is due to the fact that I ate my teeth on it and Mentzen and Bosak are kids who have no thought what they're talking about erstwhile they lie.
Undercurrent
I have criticised not only and not even above all the Law and Justice, for it is simply a waste of time especially “in my bubble”, in which everyone knows it. I criticized the opposition parties, including the 1 on the list I'm moving today. So I have a scythe with everyone, not just the PiS. I peculiarly criticized the pathology of organization politics due to the fact that they are powerful and systemically conditioned. Feudly by nature. With princes handing out seats like lenna in exchange for vassal loyalty. This is 1 of the solid structural elements of the table you want to rotation over. And which urgently needs to be changed so that the overthrow of the old does not end in a brown, populist disaster. The Confederate in these organization shoes has come in a while ago, and now it's in them and it's polishing the uppers. I don't want to turn that around.
The organization strategy will not change professional organization politicians. They'd should be judges on their own. The rules of this game must be determined by us – the people they are expected to represent. How do we do that? It's hard, but that's why I'm going to the election. My biography proves I'm not a vassal.
I besides criticized the strategy of the III Republic, the democracy which was always lame in it, starting with the tripartition of power – due to the fact that we never saw it in Poland, where parliament was always just the base of the ruling majority. The laws have been degrading the law for a long time – this is not a written invention. They did not limit the rulers and the degree of their power, but simply pursued their policies. frequently at the expense of civilian liberties, interfering with our lives in spheres which no 1 is allowed to enter – and power especially. This is another reason for my start: a parliament where there is simply a representation of the governed, not just a ruling majority and opposition fighting for power for itself, will be a step towards a actual tripartition.
The past of the 3rd Republic I criticised, showing that it was she who led to the challenge of all the rules by people manipulated by politics, “getting up from their knees” and concluding that “every politician stinks.” This rebellion has led to the disastrous regulation of the Law and along with the success of the Confederacy leads to another catastrophe – due to the fact that your rebellion is nothing new, it is akin to the revolt of the Law and Justice voters. We have seen the “replacement of generations” more than erstwhile and only a fewer of them have had good results. The state needs a thorough constitutional improvement – replacing 1 with another will not change anything. This will not be done by the redevelopment, who promises you 2 cars, beer and farts. He wants something else. I want your vote in the election, not the country where your vote truly decides.
He's trying to swim with that current he just caught, doing nothing else. And he's doing beautiful well. Thanks to you.
You want a revolution or 2 cars?
Are you convinced that politics is drugs? You're right! Me, too. But drinking in politics is empty slogans, raves alternatively of debates and free beer. In the meantime, you look at the Confederate raffle, at Mentzen throwing money around like confetti illuminated with spotlights, you look at the worst, empty political cheapness served to you without pretending to be anything else. They treat you at these rallies like a mindless herd, and you take it. You?! “Antisystemists”?! I don't understand. It's disappointing for me at the same time, due to the fact that it's in people who want to smash the strategy that I've always seen hope. besides erstwhile they were talking anti-vaccination nonsense. At least they wanted something.
You don't like taxes? Well, then let's talk about why we request you. What precisely do we request him for? If we request to. This is simply a serious question – contrary to appearances and customs of “professional politics”. The answer is not apparent at all. It's just nobody asks. Taxes – speaking of them – go on very different things.
For example, 500+, 14th retirement, and another things like that. Is that bad? Are you sure? Should the rich aid the mediocre or not? Do you want to share with the poor, due to the fact that that's what solidarity is for you? Or do you want to give them any money to buy social peace for it – a bit like Mentzen, who throws money to have your votes? And how is Kaczyński, who buys retirement votes for "fourteen"? In any case, how much money would it take, and how much would you be willing to give? Or possibly you don't gotta give anything at all, and the peace of society will be provided by the Police Prevention Divisions? If so, how much will you spend on this? And who, if anyone, is expected to control bullies with sticks and firearms patrolling the streets? How about courts? Huh?
Okay, you gotta build roads, railways, power lines. possibly that's what you need. What is the list of specified needs? What of these things must be the activities of the state, and what can be privately? What distinguishes 1 from another? Do we request public schools or private schools? Should teachers we entrust to our children for 13 years of age make more or little money than police, politicians, from the national average? Or is it adequate to pay them as much as home aid employed in black and ready to gain anything due to the fact that she just came to Poland and there is no chance for anything decent? Has anyone in Poland always asked about these things?
Speaking of teachers, should the school be forced or not and why? Is school truly expected to be uniform for everyone? Is it crucial for the school your kid goes to whether the minister is Black or individual else? And how much depends on it – in the life of your child? Should any fool in the rank of a minister be able to plan the furniture of all our children's heads on a one-man basis and set out a detailed agenda of classes for them, specifying precisely how many hours a week the children spend in exercises, and how many in bills wrongly called mathematics, how many physics and spiritual indoctrination? due to the fact that specified absurd and uncontrollable power of the minister is besides not a written invention, so in the 3rd Poland it has always been, the Law and Justice Office just planted in this seat of the deranged Czarnek, and previously unwise Zalevska. So possibly it's crucial for parents and children to not be defenseless erstwhile a fascist, idiot or gangster becomes a minister of education, due to the fact that it can always happen and, yes, it has happened more than once? Should each and all 1 of us, for example, be able to assert their constitutional rights and freedoms in a court of law and not let any moron on the minister's seat to fool our child, indoctrinate and format him as he sees fit? Isn't that how we should think about the system? By limiting power and making certain to be an equal partner?
You can ask that indefinitely and at different levels. Should a associate vote in parliament as the party's board of directors dictates, or as the voters tell him? These questions have never been raised and inactive not bet – neither has Bosak and Mentzen. Do you truly want these guys to decide, for example, on the right to abortion after agreeing positions with Mikke and Braun and then with Tuski or Kaczyński depending on who they choose to be their mate – or do you like to set specified basic principles?
Social agreement
I feel like you don't like the word "social." But you have a better deal. Better yet, the contract. It's fine with me. The state and its constitution should be a social agreement. Make it a contract. The agreement in which we decide whether the rich aid the poor, on which we drop in taxes and according to which basic rules we share them, the contract in which we decide whether teachers and guardians of our children should take more or little than, for example, police officers. Which we warrant everyone, and what people are expected to care for themselves, for any of our common help, but for our common help. An agreement in which we, the ruled, set the impossible limits of the ruling, without allowing them to interfere where we do not want them. In which we specify the essential scope of the rights and freedoms of individuals and minorities by agreeing that our common state will always defend them.
We must conclude this agreement among ourselves – citizens. It's not for politicians to date ruling coalitions. It is up to us to agree on what they are allowed to do in our common country and what we do not let them to do. They can't limit themselves. Neither does Mentzen with Bosak. The Constitution should have good records, that's true. But a good constitution is besides the 1 that citizens have written, which they accept and respect as they respect the apparent rules of conduct at the table.
This is simply a completely different image of the state than the reality of Poland in the hands of the ‘political class’, to which you dressed in boys' suits idols aspire. You should perceive to your grandpa with his grey beard on. Unless you like bullshit and you truly have specified bad taste that the Confederate kitschy estrades suit you. Those who voted for the Confederacy I realize and this choice of them I can forgive them. But don't always do that again. You will possibly be liable for the top misfortune that can happen to Poland and the people who live here.
