"Why is spring not opposed?" Jan Radomski asks on Tuesday (04.04.). After reading it, the answer comes to itself. due to the fact that people like him compose androns like those that pile in his, fortunately, not a long text. The problem is that I have heard and read akin texts since 2015 many times. In all, nothing original, but they can effectively discourage, lie and disgust politics. We know the effects. That's not how politics and things for many truly crucial things should be written.
Radomski forgot to put at the outset the motto to his paper-written thoughts. He had a choice or a quote from Kaczyński: “We no will convince you white is whiteand black is black’ or the beginning of the stadium song: ‘The Poles are fine. ♪ Not once, not twice lost ♪ The Poles are fine. The full text is fundamentally a designation of the normality of the written power – governments are simply "inept in very many respects", specified as Kopacz or Komorowski (this is my addition), but the essence of the substance lies elsewhere... The opposition is guilty of the situation, which only for 7 years has unwarrantedly “terrorizes the Law” and takes care of itself. According to the author, there is nothing else to say. I realize that Mr. Radomski accepts and approves the dismantling of the strategy of the regulation of law, ubiquitous lie and theft. He is afraid only by the ineffectiveness of the action (sic!) of the Law and Justice and the deficiency of programs and arguments on the part of the opposition, which should most likely comply with his "only right" requirements, but he does not compose about it, and for deficiency of space and chance does not share them. The written order fundamentally suits him and the opposition disturbs him. What's the problem? You don't know either. possibly it disturbs the comfort of the carefree feeling of the spring, the 1 with the garter, like in the picture, due to the fact that it reminds and warns, what will end all of this?
Where do people like Mr. Radomski come from? I do not ask how others, why specified a text in Wyborcza appeared in general, due to the fact that in rule I am in favour of a full open and free debate, although the quality of the speech and the appropriate level of editorial should be taken care of. But let's leave the issue to the editors...
For people of my generation and with our experience, the opinions made by Mr Radomski seem completely “from the cap”, they are incomprehensible and most likely they are the worst associations. They're angry, annoying, raising blood pressure. How can 1 not see and realize things as apparent as what he does with the state, our rights and freedoms and above all our common future Kaczyński? And yet you can... Our education, knowledge, and experience have clearly been established under different conditions. We have experienced solidarity from a tiny and capital letter (i.e. we are 1 of many and effort to think in terms of the common good), concepts specified as “freedom”, “truth”, “law” or “democracy” bring clear and unambiguous content, bring affirmative connotations and we can fight for them and go to prison and the reality and processes have been taught to realize in order of origin and effect. You can see the generation of Mr. Radomski, and surely Mr. Radomski is otherwise educated.
To the minimum limited autocriticism with simultaneous disregard of opinions another than their own, nonchalance and axiological indifference, and above all, which surprises me most and in any ways people like Radomski translates, moving distant from reasoning in terms of origin and effect. any unbearable lightness of being, present and individualism raised to the rank of absolute, where reasoning and acting have no consequences for others. They do not think about the consequences or realize the effects of their actions. Like in a computer game or “on chat”, where you can compose everything, due to the fact that you don't look into the eyes of the interviewer and yet you can delete the full thing. Is this a feature of Radom’s generation?
I will not forget specified an anecdote from the time erstwhile I owned an unrepentant, own restaurant, my “Marc et Bella” with the best cook in the planet and a concept for the whole. I employed mostly young people there, and bartenders, waitresses and waiters were students and students of the University of Warsaw. I was rather demanding due to the fact that the task assumed the cognition of Marc Chagall's work and life. I remember the situation to this day. Prior to the beginning of the cafe, after buying a fresh coffee maker and signing a contract with the grain supplier, 2-3 hours of training took place, which I went through, but most of all the listeners were those young people who were expected to service the guests. I'll skip the tens of interesting details for future baristas, focus on the small thing. The teacher at 1 point said that there is simply a warm plate on top of the machine, on which we set the cups so that they are at a suitable advanced temperature, due to the fact that then espresso and any another coffees taste best. He set the porcelain cups right, and erstwhile they got the right temperature, he asked us to contact them, get to know their temperature, make a fewer different coffees that we drank and then the students and students began practicing the full procedure from grinding the grains to serving the client a drink. Imagine that they understood so much of it, that they would later set a cup on this disc on a cup creating from 3-4 a reasonably tall tower and as they thought they would heat it up? The customers always poured coffee, understandablely, into the cup from the top, or the tower would have collapsed – they predicted it, but only this. More erstwhile I told them the 1 from the top would never be warmed up looking at me with surprise. It was in 2016. Now these students are +/- the age of Mr Radomski. Actually, what do you anticipate specified people to do?
This deficiency of knowing of even the simplest phenomena and processes, the deficiency of predicting the consequences of their actions, and in the case of the text of Radom's thoughts and words, is my top surprise erstwhile I think of contemporary social behaviours. Liberal democracy is accused of the existence of social inequality and a ton of another misdemeanors, and they are not disturbed by authoritarian systems taking the rights and freedoms of people. Most of us declare strong support for European integration, but any at the same time vote and support the Law and Justice organization without seeing any contradictions. This thread is besides found in Radomski's text, which actually does not realize anything... cannot link 500+, the stubbornness of the state and buying votes with today's inflation, the assassination of courts with restrictions on freedom, constitutional violations and impunity of power, the increasing conflict with the Union with the anti-Western rhetoric of the ideologists of the ruling party, as a consequence of the creeping polexit and threat to our security. All these dependencies, causes and effects are absent from reflection on what is here and now. And they want spring like a picture.
Or possibly Jan Radomski, like others, sometimes older than Jacek Żakowski, at a akin age as Grzegorz Sroczyński just don't like Tusk? And everything is ready to submit to that feeling. I remember an old highland gag about a bak who lost everything, a wife, children, a home and fell to his knees, directed his hands to God and asked – Jesus, why me? And the voice from heaven answers – someway I don't like you.
Yeah, sometimes that's adequate for everything. I don't see any another logic in this text unless Mr. Radomski truly wants to discourage the election readers, let them eat pizza, watch Netflix and leave politics to Kaczyński.
Here's a link to the referenced title article; Jan Radomski, "Why isn't spring opposed?", GW, 04.04.:
https://election.pl/7,75968,29627818,why-spring-not-is-opposition.html#S.TD-K.C-B.8-L.1.duzy
Photo: Image Мария Ткачук au Pixabay
